Letter no 3
Dear Commission B Representatives,
This is my third letter to all Commission B representatives and it is long overdue ( the preparations for the 2001 URSI - Commission B International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory, May 13 - 17, in Victoria, Canada has taken a lot of my time
( note that the next important date associated with this Symposium is the Jan. 10th deadline for applications concerning Young Scientist Awards, cf. the website
<http://www.nrc.ca/confserv/URSI-B2001>www.nrc.ca/confserv/URSI-B2001 ).
It is now time to take up the subject of the next GA. By Jan. 1st, 2001, we should have the session structure more or less established ( preferably with titles, convenors, and also Commission B Tutorial speaker identified ) .
Looking back at the Commission B program in Toronto, I note that we had 10 sessions of our own, and in addition 9 joint sessions with ( one or two ) other Commissions. In addition to this we had very comprehensive poster sessions. I also recall that a rather widespread reaction in Toronto was that the Commission B program was too heavy, with the joint sessions regularly colliding with the Commission B sessions. Essentially all of the sessions were half-day sessions.
I think we have to take the reduced length of the GA ad notam and adjust our ambitions somewhat. I suggest that an ideal total number of sessions may be around 12, and if we find that too restrictive, 15 should be a maximum.
Below I start out with a list of 7 sessions, to be organised by Commission B alone, around our "core" topics. We are asked to preferably provide two convenors for each session
( we may also wish to have a session on Asymptotic and hybrid methods ).
Joint sessions could then be designed to cover topics which in the past often has appeared in "pure" Commission B sessions, but which have been of great potential interest to other Commissions, such as
I have had preliminary contacts with some of the chairs of other commissions concerning these matters. Commission A has asked about our interest in joint sessions similar to the ones we had in Toronto, which were:
7 AB1: Time-domain measurements
8 AB 2: Antenna and EM field measurements
and I have indicated a preliminary positive response to this.
This already amounts to 15 sessions. When listing joint sessions I have used alphabetical order of the Commissions involved, i.e. I have not thought about main responsibility etc. here.
I would appreciate your comments and further suggestions about the above, particularly about names of convenors ( with a view towards bringing in some new names, I withhold my own suggestions at this stage...).
Let me also ask for suggestions concerning the Commission B Tutorial speaker. The topic should preferably be such that it could attract many listeners from other Commissions.
A quick rather than necessarily complete answer to issues mentioned above would be very much appreciated ( before Dec. 20 if possible ) !
Best wishes, Staffan Ström.